| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
677
   |
Posted - 2012.09.01 07:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
From Costa Rica wrote:Check the dev post on the new build know errors, we got to sisi but a lot of thing are yet not implemented.
Sticky: The gates of Singularity are opening! in General Discussions
It links to a dev post stating
CCP Habakuk wrote:Transferring ISK to Dust mercs will send the ISK to the nearest black hole instead.
|
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 08:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
kalahari ilkeston wrote:Time to do another black hole run?
Do try.
For the fun of it I sent a billion isk to my Dustbuster, just to test if the isk transfer were still disabled, and I doubt I'm the only one to have send tons of isk, either accidentally, not knowing, or just to test it.
In other words, there must be a very rich black hole out there... |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 09:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
DeeJay One wrote:Dewie Cheecham wrote:kalahari ilkeston wrote:Time to do another black hole run? Do try. For the fun of it I sent a billion isk to my Dustbuster, just to test if the isk transfer were still disabled, and I doubt I'm the only one to have send tons of isk, either accidentally, not knowing, or just to test it. In other words, there must be a very rich black hole out there... Well, transferring ISK won't be there for a few more builds probably if at all this year. A 99,(9)% taxon the transfers is also probable. Anyway this thread belongs to https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=148266 not the Dust forum.
Actually, I'd say it belongs on both. |
Dewie Cheecham
Villore Sec Ops
Gallente Federation
677
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 11:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
DeeJay One wrote:Dewie Cheecham wrote:Actually, I'd say it belongs on both. You can't transfer anything in Dust between chars, so this issue doesn't exist here. It's a problem with the EVE client which let's you do things it shouldn't ;)
They just didn't add the block as they intend the feature to exist, and spending Dev time on removing something temporarily would be inefficient. |
| |
|